In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once supplied many jobs have vanished. Now, the county is labeled as a “food desert,” indicating residents are often distant from grocery stores. Acknowledging this challenge, local non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016, working with farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the area, where around 30% of the population is Black, and about 25% face poverty.
Initially, Ms. Ashby funded the initiative with her personal savings and small grants. However, in 2023, her efforts received a significant boost when the Walmart Foundation—the philanthropic branch of one of the nation’s largest corporations—granted her organization over $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was part of a broader $1.5 million initiative aimed at supporting “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“It moved me to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances where you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates your efforts.”
A mere two years ago, initiatives like this received extensive support from large companies throughout the U.S., as the nation confronted systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who lost his life beneath the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
Yet, several of these companies are now withdrawing from those pledges. In November, Walmart revealed it would end certain diversity programs, including the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, which had played a key role in providing Ms. Ashby’s grant.
Firms like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have undertaken comparable actions, highlighting a more extensive corporate retraction from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
This change signifies a significant cultural transition, spurred partially by concerns over legal challenges, regulatory oversight, and social media backlash—pressures intensified by the new U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has actively sought to dismantle DEI programs, pushing for a shift back to “merit-based opportunity” in the U.S. He has directed the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and begin investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of “illegal DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put nearly 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump ousted the nation’s top military general—a Black individual—after the defense secretary had earlier recommended his removal because of his connection to “woke” DEI strategies.
Initially, it might appear that the U.S. has forsaken efforts to enhance outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. However, some experts propose that these initiatives could continue, though under different titles that resonate more closely with the evolving political landscape of a nation that has just chosen a leader determined to oppose “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
Programs modeled after DEI initially gained traction in the United States during the 1960s, as a reaction to the civil rights movement, which aimed to enhance and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Originally termed as “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives were designed to address the enduring effects of slavery and the institutionalized discrimination imposed by Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements expanded to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language describing these efforts widened to incorporate “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
Within businesses and government institutions, DEI efforts primarily targeted hiring strategies that portrayed diversity as a financial benefit. Supporters contend that these programs tackle inequalities across different communities, though a significant focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The push for DEI gained momentum in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter protests and escalating calls for social change. Walmart, for example, committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo hired its inaugural chief diversity officer, while firms like Google and Nike already had similar leadership positions established. After these developments, S&P 100 companies generated more than 300,000 new jobs, with 94% filled by people of color, as reported by Bloomberg.
Nonetheless, as swiftly as these initiatives grew, a conservative pushback arose.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, argues that DEI programs fundamentally divide people along racial and gender lines.
In recent times, critics have amplified claims that DEI efforts—initially intended to fight discrimination—are themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Training workshops that emphasize “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.
The roots of this opposition stem from conservative resistance to critical race theory (CRT), an academic framework that suggests racism is deeply embedded in American society. Over time, campaigns against CRT in schools evolved into broader efforts to penalize “woke corporations.”
Online platforms like End Wokeness and conservative personalities such as Robby Starbuck have leveraged this feeling, directing attention to companies for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has taken credit for changes in policy at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after revealing their DEI programs to his audience on social media.
One prominent success for this movement occurred in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Boycott calls targeting the brand and its parent firm, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, according to an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another significant milestone came in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decreed that race could no longer be a consideration in university admissions, effectively dismantling decades of affirmative action policies.
This ruling raised questions about the legal basis of corporate DEI policies. In the wake of the decision, Meta notified employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before announcing the end of its own DEI initiatives.
Corporate Retreat: A Question of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI initiatives among large corporations prompts questions regarding the genuineness of their dedication to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit conducting surveys on workplace issues—suggests that numerous companies initially adopted DEI initiatives to “appear favorable” following the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than from an authentic commitment to change.
Nevertheless, not all corporations are succumbing to political and legal pressures. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation indicated that although DEI programs seem to be diminishing, “nearly all” Fortune 500 firms still incorporate DEI pledges within their official declarations. Furthermore, Apple shareholders recently voted to preserve the company’s diversity initiatives.
Public sentiment on DEI is split. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has diminished, but support for related matters—such as equitable pay—remains robust. In parallel, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey discovered that a majority (56%) of working adults still perceive workplace DEI efforts as advantageous.
